| |
Voxel Visualization:
Voxel Volumetric Techniques for Oil Sands Production Optimization (appears in Oil and Gas Journal, June 23, 2008) James Cormier-Chisholm
Subterranetech Inc.Calgary
This
article outlines a volumetric visual method (voxel volumetric method)
to visualize and model underground geological structures for optimizing
in situ steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) well placement. This
voxel volumetric method uses logged well data from 257 shallow wells
drilled in a 10 sq km area of a multibillion dollar tar sands project.
Well log data are input into a voxel imagery method that creates an
accurate visualization of complex underground structures relevant to
optimizing bitumen sands production. The difficulty is
the complex geology of the tar sands deposits. Lack of understanding of
the stratigraphy and sedimentology of the reservoir sands can hinder
exploitation from regional exploration aspects as well as site-specific
production and development.[1]
Brief SAGD reviewIn
the SAGD process, steam injected into an upper injection well heats the
surrounding bitumen-saturated sand and mobilizes bitumen oil. The
mobilized bitumen, under the force of gravity, migrates to production
wells. Geological structures under ground can form
permeability barriers that hinder the above SAGD process. Such
structures can cause oil production rates to decline, steam/oil ratios
to increase, and reserves to be left behind as a result. Optimal
SAGD design is achieved when volume of steam coverage is unimpeded by
impermeable layers of shale or clay (otherwise known as lateral
accretions) associated with meandering fluvial systems. Careful well
placement also minimizes steam requirements.[2]
Due
to sound wave physics limiting the nature of seismic methods,
geologists and geophysicists are finding that it is a difficult and
complex task to fully integrate finer details of geological structures
in tar sands deposits, such as sand dominated bedding packages, precise
vertical continuity of individual channel deposits, and the erosional
contacts between similar lithologies. Seismic methods are limited to
mapping large-scale features, such as the lateral extent of major
meandering channels.[3]Well data were used from a
project that consists of a surface mine development and partly of SAGD
development in the Lower McMurray formation. In the Lower McMurray
formation (defined by the Alberta Geological Society as the lower part
of Upper McMurray formation), significant sedimentation for hydrocarbon
accumulation occurs in low-stand fluvial-estuarine incised valleys,
where a meandering river system deposited reservoir-quality point-bar
sands, said point-bars contain several distinct facies, each with
different reservoir properties (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Estaurine
Oil sands Depostional Environment Dominated by Meandering
Channels.
The McMurray sands range from 20 m to 58 m
thick, maintain high porosities from 30% to 35%, and are extremely
permeable with permeabilities commonly ranging from 3 to 10 darcies.[2]
The facies of particular concern with respect to
excellent bitumen extraction potential consists of medium to large
scale trough crossbedded, fine to medium grained sand with rare mud
drapes and laminae. The voxel visualization in this article is based on
this particular formation of concern, as logged by client company
geologists. Voxel imageryVoxel is short for voxel volume pixel, the smallest distinguishable box-shaped part of a three-dimensional image. Voxelization
is the process of adding depth to an image using a set of
cross-sectional images known as a volumetric dataset. These
cross-sectional images or slices are made up of pixels. The space
between any two pixels in one slice is referred to as interpixel
distance, which represents a real-world distance. And, the distance
between any two slices is referred to as interslice distance, which
represents a real-world depth.
The dataset is processed when
slices are stacked in computer memory based on interpixel and
interslice distances to accurately reflect the real-world sampled
volume. Next, additional slices are created and inserted between the
dataset’s actual slices so that the entire volume is represented as one
solid block of data.
Now that the dataset exists as a solid
block of data, the pixels in each slice have taken on volume and are
now voxels. For a true 3D image, voxels must undergo opacity
transformation along with tricubic interpolation. The tricubic
interpolation ties structural elements tagged between wells together to
form a picture of an underground structure.
Opacity
transformation gives voxels different opacity values. This is
important: it is crucial to expose interior details of an image
that would otherwise be hidden by darker, more opaque outside-layer
voxels.
Voxel images are primarily used in the field of medicine
and are applied to X-rays, computed axial tomography (CAT) Scans, and
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) so surgeon professionals can obtain
accurate 3D models of the human body. We developed voxel imagery
software and techniques that took core descriptions tagged by
geologists as “excellent bitumen intervals”. Excellent bitumen
intervals were considered by geologists as any bitumen core which had
greater than or equal to 13% weight to weight bitumen content.
These excellent bitumen intervals were converted into three dimensional
spatial references which served as useful input in the voxel volumetric
method developed by our firm.
Company project geologists had
logged several thousand meters of core data. Using a cut
off criterion of 13% bitumen content weight to weight, company
geologists had tagged the well latitude, longitude and depth of each of
these high percentage bitumen content cores. Longitude, latitude
and depth is equivalent to the X, Y, and Z axis on our
figures. The Z axis, or the dimension representing depth
underground, has been exaggerated approximately 9 times in our
voxel figures in order to better show geological structures.
Bitumen content greater than or equal to 13% weight to weight bitumen
content, considered at the time of the project 4 years ago as an
economically significant cutoff value, was logged visually by project
geologists, followed by a laboratory program that provided quantitative
numerical weight to weight figures that had excellent correlation with
geological observations.
Our technique only used as input logged
core data meeting the 13% economic cutoff criterion or above this
criterion. In other words, only structures of economic resource
interest are mapped by this 3D method in three dimensions, and only
data logged from project geologists were used, filtered by a greater
than or equal to company-specific 13% bitumen weight to weight content.
This resulted in the following comprehensive visualization of 10 sq km
of tar sands north of Fort McMurray (Figs. 2 and 3).

Figure 2: Raw Voxel Image Oil Sands Underground

Figure 3. 10^2 kilometres Squared of Oil Sands Showing Meandering Channels and Point Bar Structures
These figures shows a complex estuarine environment composed of inter-fingered channel deposits.
Figure
4 represents a blow up of Figure 3. One can observe the confluence of
several point bar structures in the blow up figure which represents a
future potential mine. Estuarine channels, which represent low
bitumen potential and bounding structures for point bars, can be
readily observed in the figure as sinuous structures. It is
easy to observe sediment mounding and one incised valley in profile
along the upper edge of the voxel image.

Figure 4 Blow up voxel image of future mine area
In
the horizontal X and Y plane of the figure, subtle textural and color
changes represent inner to outer point bar structural detail.
Cross cutting relationships between meandering channels illustrates for
geologists the time sequence of channel development in this estuarine
underground environment. These cross cutting relationships can be
readily observed in Figures 3 and 4.
This voxel visualization
technology was developed in response to the inadequacy of seismic-based
techniques to clearly define point bar structures in underground
estuarine environments. Accurate visualizations of underground
structure can provide production and geological planning teams with the
necessary means to develop an optimal production plan for SAGD
technology/surface mine developments. The same technology is also
applicable to visualization of underground structures in traditional
oil and gas plays as demonstrated by an image of an anticline trap
based on well data (Fig. 5).

Figure 5 Anticline Gas Trap Revealed by Voxel Imagery
SummaryThe
described voxel volumetric techniques and software provide the means to
accurately visualize an estuarine-fluvial environment, and in
particular point bar structures associated with excellent bitumen
extraction potential. References 1. McPhee, D.,
and Ranger, M.J., “The geological challenge for development of heavy
crude and oil sands of western Canada ,” UNITAR/UNDP 14th International
Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands Proceedings, 1998, pp. 1,765-77. 2.
Contreras, C., Drinkwater, N., Geel Cees, R., Hodgetts, D, Hu, G.,
Johannessen, E., Johannessen, M., Mizobe, A., Montaggioni, P., Pestman,
P., Ray, S., and Saltmarsh, A., “Investigating clastic reservoir
sedimentology,” Oilfield Review, Spring 2003, p. 60. 3.
Fustic, M., Skulski, L., Hanson, W., Vanhooren, D., Bessette, P.,
Hinks, D., Bellman, L., and Leckie, D., “Geological mapping and
reservoir characterization of oil sands reservoir by integrating 3D
seismic, dipmeter, core descriptions, and analogs in the McMurray
formation, northeastern Alberta,” Search and Discovery, Feb. 2008, p. 3. 4.
Hein, F., Cotterill, D., and Berhane, H., “An atlas of lithofacies of
the McMurray formation, Athabasca oil sands deposit, northeastern
Alberta: surface and subsurface,” Alberta Geological Survey, Earth
Sciences Report 2000-7, June 2000, p. 144.
|
|